From: | "Paolo Bizzarri" <pibizza(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Corruption of files in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2007-06-05 12:25:24 |
Message-ID: | 5213d1d20706050525v842eb15g666dd680c991699d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Scott,
in fact, we were using a 2.6.12 kernel. Can this be a problem?
Best regards.
Paolo Bizzarri
On 6/4/07, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
> Paolo Bizzarri wrote:
> > On 6/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> "Paolo Bizzarri" <pibizza(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> > On 6/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> >> Please provide a reproducible test case ...
> >>
> >> > as explained above, the problem seems quite random. So I need to
> >> > understand what we have to check.
> >>
> >> In this context "reproducible" means that the failure happens
> >> eventually. I don't care if the test program only fails once in
> >> thousands of tries --- I just want a complete self-contained example
> >> that produces a failure.
> >
> > As said above, our application is rather complex and involves several
> > different pieces of software, including Zope, OpenOffice both as
> > server and client, and PostgreSQL. We are absolutely NOT sure that the
> > problem is inside PostgreSQL.
> >
> > What we are trying to understand is, first and foremost, if there are
> > known cases under which PostgreSQL can truncate a file.
>
> I would suspect either your hardware (RAID controller, hard drive, cache
> etc) or your OS (kernel bug, file system bug, etc)
>
> For instance:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/215868/
>
> documents a bug in the 2.6 linux kernel that can result in corrupted
> files if there are a lot of processes accessing it at once.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chander Ganesan | 2007-06-05 13:03:49 | Re: High-availability |
Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2007-06-05 12:20:18 | Re: multimaster |