Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax

From: Karol Trzcionka <karlikt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Date: 2013-08-19 19:21:53
Message-ID: 52127051.4070004@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

W dniu 19.08.2013 19:56, Boszormenyi Zoltan pisze:
> * Does it apply cleanly to the current git master?
>
> No. There's a reject in src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
Thank you, merged in attached version.
>
> * Does it include reasonable tests?
>
> Yes but the test fails after trying to fix the rejected chunk of the
> patch.
It fails because the "HINT" was changed, fixed.
That version merges some nested "ifs" left over from earlier work.
Regards,
Karol Trzcionka

Attachment Content-Type Size
before_after_v5.patch text/x-patch 31.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-08-19 19:25:38 Re: danger of stats_temp_directory = /dev/shm
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2013-08-19 19:14:39 Re: Backup throttling