| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |
| Date: | 2013-08-19 18:03:52 |
| Message-ID: | 52125E08.4020107@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/19/2013 09:23 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
> Indeed, it's a big nail in the coffin for SRFs-in-targetlist. Having
> WITH ORDINALITY and this feature, I would vote for removing
> SRF-in-targetlist and call the release PostgreSQL 10.0.
That's not realistic. We'd have to deprecate that syntax and
repeatedly and loudly warn people about it for at least 3 years after
the release of 9.3. You're talking about asking people to refactor
hundreds or thousands of lines of code which makes current use of things
like regex_match() in the target list.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-08-19 18:04:38 | Re: danger of stats_temp_directory = /dev/shm |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-08-19 18:02:59 | Re: pgstat_reset_remove_files ignores its argument |