Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER
Date: 2003-05-20 18:16:57
Message-ID: 521.1053454617@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> David is going to talk with Joe about doing some special logging for DDL
> operations; if they come out of it with some clean code, would you
> consider a patch that includes an new logging option for "log_ddl" ?

No objection here. We saw a recent request for logging only
data-modifying statements, too (ie, everything but SELECTs).
Might be worth thinking about whether those two cases cover it,
or whether there needs to be some more-general way of choosing
which statements to log according to their type.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-05-20 18:19:36 Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-05-20 18:11:06 Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER