Re: StrategyGetBuffer optimization, take 2

From: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)enova(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: StrategyGetBuffer optimization, take 2
Date: 2013-08-14 18:23:06
Message-ID: 520BCB0A.3040707@enova.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/14/13 8:30 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Performance testing this patch is a real bugaboo for me; the VMs I have to work with are too unstable to give useful results :-(. Need to scrounge up a doner box somewhere...

I offered a server or two to the community a while ago but I don't think anything was ever resolved. It wouldn't have a massive number of cores (only 24 IIRC), but it would have a lot of memory (definitely over 192G; maybe more).

The community just needs to decide it wants it and where it gets shipped to...
--
Jim Nasby, Lead Data Architect
(512) 569-9461 (primary) (512) 579-9024 (backup)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2013-08-14 18:27:23 Re: System catalog vacuum issues
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-08-14 14:51:28 Re: CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW .. FOR UPDATE