On 08/13/2013 09:57 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Is this a blocker for 9.3?
Why would it be? This issue doesn't originate with 9.3.
> If it is a concern of not what is deleted but rather that someone can
> inject a poisoned stats file into the directory, does it need to be
> back-patched all the way, as that could be done before the split
> patch?
I'd say it's a backpatch. We'll need to warn the heck out of users, though.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com