From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
Date: | 2013-08-07 17:04:08 |
Message-ID: | 52027E08.8040508@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
> There are three issues here:
>
> 1. What will best motive reviewers?
> 2. What is a reasonable effort to accomplish #1?
> 3. What is acceptable for release note readers?
>
> You seem to be only focused on #1, and you don't want to address the
> other items --- that's fine --- I will still be around if people lose
> interest or the system becomes unworkable.
Both I and other people have already addressed #2 and #3. You're also
having a huge failure of perspective here. Motivating reviewers allows
our project to continue developing PostgreSQL. Items 2 and 3 are so
insignificant in comparison to that as to not be worth discussing.
In the novels The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, there's a spaceship
which has been waiting 1000 years to take off because it's waiting for a
load of lemon-soaked paper napkins to be loaded. You are being Mr.
Lemon-Soaked Paper Napkin.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-08-07 17:07:18 | Re: StrategyGetBuffer optimization, take 2 |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2013-08-07 16:54:09 | Re: 9.4 regression |