From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A plague of link spam ... |
Date: | 2013-03-16 18:48:33 |
Message-ID: | 52010C9D-0538-45D2-B781-32CC869B3533@pgadmin.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 16 Mar 2013, at 18:34, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> On 03/15/2013 09:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>>> On 03/15/2013 07:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> (I am only about one or two more spams away from
>>>> summarily blocking all yahoo traffic from my own mail server, btw.
>>>> They account for easily a third of all the spam I'm seeing lately.)
>>
>>> yeah abuse on yahoo accounts is really bad, but I don't think we can
>>> block those in general...
>>
>> TBH, I think Yahoo doesn't give a damn about their spam problem because
>> they think they're too big for anybody to block them. It's not going to
>> get better until some people start to do so anyway.
>
> yeah yahoo seems to be unable to deal with them - there is tons of
> discussions about the yahoo DKIM-signed-"only a link" spam on the
> spamassassin lists for example and some people consider it the "#1 spam
> problem" there...
>
>
> However - I still don't think we can seriously consider blocking all of
> yahoo inbound - what do others think about this?
>
Sooner or later someone has to make a stand.
Disclaimer: I'm with Devrim in London. And England just lost to Wales.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2013-03-16 18:52:17 | Re: A plague of link spam ... |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2013-03-16 18:34:12 | Re: A plague of link spam ... |