From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-02-26 18:02:13 |
Message-ID: | 51fca6b6c0032d28e053ad89f7e858e2a9e498af.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 04:25 -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> 0001 - Add attnum support to attribute_statistics_update
>
> * Basically what Tom posted earlier, minus the pg_set_attribute_stats
> stuff, obviously.
Should have a couple simple tests.
And I would use two different error message wordings:
"must specify either attname or attnum"
"cannot specify both attname and attnum"
(or similar)
The "one of attname and attnum" is a bit awkward.
The new struct for pg_clear_attribute_stats() isn't great, but as
discussed we can get rid of that in a subsequent commit.
Otherwise LGTM.
> 0002 - Add attnum support to pg_dump.
>
> * Removed att_stats_arginfo
> * Folds appendRelStatsImport and appendAttStatsImport
> into dumpRelationStats
Can we add a test here, too, to check that tables dump the attname and
indexes dump the attnum?
Everything else in the file uses i_fieldname = PQfnumber(), but in this
patch you're just using raw numbers.
Some of the fields from pg_stats are NOT NULL, so we could consider
issuing a warning in that case rather than just skipping it.
And it could use a pgindent.
I ran a quick measurement and it appears within the noise of the
numbers I posted here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6af48508a32499a8be3398cafffd29fb6188c44b.camel@j-davis.com
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-26 18:06:26 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Previous Message | Sadeq Dousti | 2025-02-26 17:50:45 | Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes |