Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains

From: Chris Withers <chris(at)simplistix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains
Date: 2016-09-16 10:46:47
Message-ID: 51f90c7b-acb7-040f-73af-2c736accc6cb@simplistix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 16/09/2016 10:26, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/16/2016 2:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> wait, what is a tsrange? the standard textsearch data types in
>> postgres are tsvector and tsquery,
>
> never mind, I should have known, its a timestamp range. ...
>
>
> when you do updates, are you changing any of the indexed fields, or
> just "value" ?
Yeah, it's a temporal table, so "updates" involve modifying the period
column for a row to set its end ts, and then inserting a new row with a
start ts running on from that.

Of course, the adds are just inserting new rows.

cheers,

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2016-09-16 11:00:42 Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains
Previous Message Chris Withers 2016-09-16 10:46:35 Re: performance problems with bulk inserts/updates on tsrange with gist-based exclude constrains