From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: replace strtok() |
Date: | 2024-10-15 12:00:00 |
Message-ID: | 51cbebb6-f5e6-4496-3fc2-df6869f08f82@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Ranier and Peter,
15.10.2024 14:44, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
>
> Em ter., 15 de out. de 2024 às 03:45, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> escreveu:
>
>
> Thanks for the analysis. I think moreover we *only* need to check the
> "stringp" for NULL, not the return value of strsep(), which would never
> be NULL in our case. So I propose the attached patch as a variant of yours.
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but the contrib passwordcheck uses and It's not very safe.
> The checks of NULL return are cheap, and will protect unwary users.
>
> So I'm neutral here.
I also wonder, if other places touched by 5d2e1cc11 need corrections too.
I played with
PG_COLOR=always PG_COLORS="error=01;31" .../initdb
and it looks like this free() call in pg_logging_init():
char *colors = strdup(pg_colors_env);
if (colors)
{
...
while ((token = strsep(&colors, ":")))
{
...
}
free(colors);
}
gets null in colors.
Best regards,
Alexander
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2024-10-15 12:07:16 | Re: replace strtok() |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2024-10-15 11:44:17 | Re: replace strtok() |