| From: | Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)ztk-rp(dot)eu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FK v.s unique indexes |
| Date: | 2018-07-05 07:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | 51c04eeb-38d2-eb69-2508-d310504e44ce@ztk-rp.eu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
W dniu 03.07.2018 o 11:23, David Rowley pisze:
> On 3 July 2018 at 19:30, Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)ztk-rp(dot)eu> wrote:
[---------------]
>>
>> Why is this forbidden?
>
> I don't think there were any actual roadblocks, it was more of just
> not enough time in the cycle to make it work due to a few technical
> details that required extra effort to make work.
>
> Alvaro managed to simplify the problem and allow foreign keys to be
> defined on partitioned tables and get that into PG11.
>
> So it was a case of 50% is better than 0%, which I very agree with.
>
I see.
It's great and usefull, yes. And I'm looking forward to see the other 50% :)
Thenx!!
-R
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Sargent | 2018-07-05 08:11:51 | Re: FK v.s unique indexes |
| Previous Message | Rafal Pietrak | 2018-07-05 07:30:08 | Re: FK v.s unique indexes |