From: | Matthew Terenzio <matt(at)jobsforge(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql Hosting |
Date: | 2005-09-10 00:04:49 |
Message-ID: | 51b7313b4b73773b5e0f3547420afc87@jobsforge.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sep 9, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Matthew Terenzio wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2005, at 7:54 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 18:35, Matthew Terenzio wrote:
>>> On Sep 9, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Ron Mayer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've found that with if you can get 5 companies/users to share a
>>>> dedicated server you can be much better off than a hosting plan,
>>>> and have full control over the services you run.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm sure the numbers work out, but it sounds like being in a Band.
>>> Granted, companies and geeks aren't as flaky as Bass players, but you
>>> still probably have to pick good people to partner with or else it
>>> ends
>>> up being a big headache and sometimes even a wallet drain.
>>
>> Otherwise, somebody's tone deaf boyfriend or girlfriend will want to
>> sing (i.e. sysadmin)... And then it's just a downward spiral from
>> there.
>>
Exactly, or maybe someone decides they want to cover some cheesy pop
song (MS FrontPage extensions) and then your on stage with your pants
down.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-09-10 02:40:40 | Re: PostgreSQL local replication |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-10 00:01:49 | Re: Support for Limit in Update, Insert... |