| From: | KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bottlenecks with large number of relation segment files |
| Date: | 2013-08-05 09:40:10 |
| Message-ID: | 51FF72FA.4000604@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
(2013/08/05 17:14), Amit Langote wrote:
> So, within the limits of max_files_per_process, the routines of file.c
> should not become a bottleneck?
It may not become bottleneck.
1 FD consumes 160 byte in 64bit system. See linux manual at "epoll".
Regards,
--
Mitsumasa KONDO
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luca Ferrari | 2013-08-05 09:44:09 | Re: incremental dumps |
| Previous Message | P. Broennimann | 2013-08-05 09:22:53 | dblink / Insert several records into remote table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-08-05 10:28:41 | Re: Bottlenecks with large number of relation segment files |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-08-05 09:28:49 | Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |