Re: [9.4 CF 1]Commitfest ... over!

From: Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1]Commitfest ... over!
Date: 2013-08-03 03:12:26
Message-ID: 51FC751A.20208@uptime.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2013/08/03 8:47), Josh Berkus wrote:
> Given that we can expect to be dealing with more patches per CF in the
> future, I'd like some feedback about what things would make the CF
> process more efficient. For that matter, for the first time we tried
> enforcing some of the "rules" of CFs this time, and I'd like to hear if
> people think that helped.

The 5-day rule (and the notifications from CFM) seemed to be working
for me. It helped me focus on the patch review.

Regards,
--
Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>
Uptime Technologies, LLC. http://www.uptime.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesse Denardo 2013-08-03 03:20:37 Re: 9.3beta2: Failure to pg_upgrade
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-08-03 02:44:57 Re: [HACKERS] 9.3beta2: Failure to pg_upgrade