From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Date: | 2013-08-01 18:02:12 |
Message-ID: | 51FAA2A4.6070302@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/01/2013 10:24 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Let's please NOT call it conf.d if it's living in PGDATA and is not
>> meant to be edited by hand. conf.d is for a directory of config files
>> created by users and external utilities, living in CONFIGDIR.
>
> How nice that that's not what's being discussed here then. conf.d *IS*
> the thing thats been proposed to be a separate feature from ALTER
> SYSTEM. For the use case you describe.
Some of the earlier emails sounded like that's exactly what was
proposed. Glad to clarify then.
*if* we do file-per-setting, what do you think of the directory name
system_set or system_conf then?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-08-01 18:09:47 | Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-08-01 17:48:13 | Re: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |