Re: reply-to set

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reply-to set
Date: 2013-07-30 22:38:40
Message-ID: 51F84070.9030101@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 07/30/2013 03:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> For a PostgreSQL release announcement, for example, we want anybody who
>> has a comment or question to send mail to press(at)postgresql(dot)org, NOT to
>> the sysadmin who posted the actual -announce email. Having a noreply@
>> mailing address would enforce that.
>
> So what you really want is for announcements to carry
> a Reply-To: press(at)postgresql(dot)org header, which you can do already and
> wouldn't be broken by the change I'm introducing.

OK, makes sense. We'll need to promulgate some information for posters
to -announce though on how to set Reply-To.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2013-08-06 22:37:49 Searching 9.3beta documentation does not work
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-07-30 22:08:00 Re: reply-to set