| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz(at)ebureau(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Insert result does not match record count |
| Date: | 2013-07-24 14:04:03 |
| Message-ID: | 51EFDED3.6060101@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 07/22/2013 06:20 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz(at)ebureau(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am moving some data from one table to another in 9.2.4, and keep seeing this strange scenario:
>>
>> insert into newtable select data from oldtable where proc_date >= x and proc_date < y;
>>
>> INSERT 0 78551642
>>
>> select count(*) from newtable where proc_date >= x and proc_date < y;
>> count
>> -----------
>> 4373518938
> It looks to me like the status report is 32 bits and overflowed.
>
> 4,373,518,938 - 2^32 = 78,551,642
Attached is a small patch that should fix the problem.
Vik
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| completion_tag_64.patch | text/x-patch | 3.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Some Developer | 2013-07-24 14:40:12 | Re: Why are stored procedures looked on so negatively? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-07-24 13:58:29 | Re: Why are stored procedures looked on so negatively? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-07-24 14:57:14 | Re: [bug fix] PITR corrupts the database cluster |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-07-24 14:01:15 | Re: [bug fix] PITR corrupts the database cluster |