Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date: 2013-07-23 02:17:38
Message-ID: 51EDE7C2.1060607@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

After pushes from a few people, the remaining submissions are now
waiting for commit. I updated each of those to have the latest info in
the CF app, and tried to identify what committers have already looked at
them.

Access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement: ?

Add more regression tests mostly for ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY .. ADD/DROP:
? Robert Haas gave a quick review last week that's generated an
update since. But that looks it was just a quick scan for issues.

Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already)

SQL Command to edit postgresql.conf ("ALTER SYSTEM" patch): Alvaro
volunteered to look at this if no one else gets to it first.

UNNEST() (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY: Greg Stark

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-07-23 02:41:49 Re: RangeTblEntry.joinaliasvars representation change
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-07-23 02:02:30 Re: Preventing tuple-table leakage in plpgsql