From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
Date: | 2013-07-12 17:49:46 |
Message-ID: | 51E041BA.4080305@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/12/2013 01:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> -- a couple of compromise proposals were made:
>>
>> a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get
>> credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at
>> the bottom of the release notes, or
>>
>> b) that all "names" move to a web page on www.postgresql.org and come
>> out of the release notes entirely.
>>
>> Speaking as a commitfest manager, I favor compromise proposal (a),
>> personally. Does (a) seem somehow terrible to anyone?
> I like (a) myself, though I'd amend it so that "extensive work on the
> patch" is required to qualify as co-author, which may or may not be
> code.
>
I'd probably say "substantial" or "non-trivial", but otherwise +1
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-07-12 19:18:15 | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-12 17:48:56 | Re: column "b" is of type X but expression is of type text |