Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?

From: "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <graeme(dot)bell(at)nibio(dot)no>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Date: 2015-07-09 16:31:29
Message-ID: 51DDFB5B-2D2F-4126-9CD4-89BD3C271C91@skogoglandskap.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On 09 Jul 2015, at 17:42, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The community maintains it's own mailing list archives in
> postgresql.org. Short of an array of tactical nuclear strikes this is
> going to be preserved

Good to know, I've seen a lot of dead software projects throughout my life.

But still - we will have to pray that Kim Jong Un never decides to become a MySQL contributor... :)

Graeme.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-07-09 16:45:25 Re: pg_stat_all_indexes understand
Previous Message Graeme B. Bell 2015-07-09 15:59:55 Re: [BUGS] BUG #13493: pl/pgsql doesn't scale with cpus (PG9.3, 9.4)