From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ivan babrou <ibobrik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Millisecond-precision connect_timeout for libpq |
Date: | 2013-07-10 17:46:48 |
Message-ID: | 51DD9E08.9050602@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/09/2013 01:18 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> It's fairly common with certain kinds of apps, including Rails and PHP.
>> This is one of the reasons why we've discussed having a kind of
>> stripped-down version of pgbouncer built into Postgres as a connection
>> manager. If it weren't valuable to be able to relocate pgbouncer to
>> other hosts, I'd still say that was a good idea.
>
> for the record, I think this is a great idea.
Well, we discussed this a bit last year. I'd personally love to have an
event-based connection manager tied to local Postgres, which could use
all of PostgreSQL's various authentication methods. For the simple
case, where a user has a rails/mod_python/PHP app which just spawns lots
of connections, this could make the whole "too many connections"
headache go away as a concern for first-time users.
We'd still need pgbouncer for the serious scalability cases (so that we
could put it on other machines), but I am a bit tired of explaining how
to manage max_connections to people.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-10 18:26:48 | Re: Listen/notify across clusters |
Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2013-07-10 17:06:14 | Re: hardware donation |