| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids? |
| Date: | 2013-07-09 04:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | 51DB9269.9020600@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/09/2013 11:03 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> I don't think rewriting it in Perl is necessary or even desirable. I
>> don't see anything particularly unportable in that script as it is.
>
> I was under the impression that the final patch ought to work on
> Windows too. However, I suppose that since the number of people that
> use windows as an everyday development machine is probably zero, we
> could reasonably forgo doing anything on that platform.
I'd say that the number who use Windows *and the unix-like build chain*
day to day is going to be zero.
If you're using the Visual Studio based toolchain with vcbuild.pl,
vcregress.pl, etc you're not going to notice or care about this change.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-07-09 04:40:46 | Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-07-09 04:09:23 | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |