From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation/help for materialized and recursive views |
Date: | 2013-07-01 14:52:55 |
Message-ID: | 51D197C7.8060503@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/1/13 10:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 6/28/13 2:27 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>>>> You can run \! man from within psql,
>>> And if you're on Windows, you're Sadly Out of Luck with that. Is
>>> there an equivalent we could #ifdef in for that platform?
>>
>> If you are using psql on Windows extensively, you probably have one of
>> mingw, cygwin, or pgadmin handy, all of which can get you to the
>> documentation. I don't think it's worth devising a mechanism for those
>> not covered by this.
>
> With deepest respect, failing to provide documentation to users on our
> widest-deployed platform seems pretty hostile to me.
As I argue above, I don't think this is the widest-deployed platform.
The actual platform in use is either mingw, which has man, or
click-and-drool, which has pgadmin, both of which provide the documentation.
> There was an
> earlier suggestion that we provide URLs, which seems like a decent way
> forward as those environments so locked down as to disallow outbound
> HTTP are pretty rare, and non-networked computers are even more rare.
Does clicking on links in cmd.exe do anything useful?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-01 15:00:39 | Re: checking variadic "any" argument in parser - should be array |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-07-01 14:36:37 | Re: New regression test time |