| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpython implementation |
| Date: | 2013-06-30 12:37:37 |
| Message-ID: | 51D02691.7090007@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/30/2013 08:18 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
>
>
>
> python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no
> plpython, only plpythonu - hence only one interpreter per backend
> is needed.
>
>
> Is there any track of the discussion that there is no way to make the
> sandbox? I managed to create some kind of sandbox, a simple
> modification which totally disables importing modules, so I'm just
> wondering why it cannot be done.
>
If your sandbox is simple it's almost certainly going to be broken. I
suggest you use Google to research the topic. Our discussions should be
in the mailing list archives.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Szymon Guz | 2013-06-30 12:42:24 | Re: plpython implementation |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2013-06-30 12:31:46 | Re: plpython implementation |