Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, tender wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Date: 2023-12-14 11:25:46
Message-ID: 51CDC533-DBE7-48E2-85A5-2B61A77E4163@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 14 Dec 2023, at 16:06, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have noticed
> a very good improvement with the addition of patch 0003.

Indeed, a very impressive results! It’s almost x2 of performance on high contention scenario, on top of previous improvements.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tender wang 2023-12-14 11:32:06 Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-12-14 11:10:34 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby