Re: JDBC 4 Compliance

From: Bryan Varner <bvarner(at)polarislabs(dot)com>
To: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC 4 Compliance
Date: 2013-06-27 14:33:22
Message-ID: 51CC4D32.8070700@polarislabs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc


> Long term we'll have to see whether we want to maintain two codebases.
> For now let's experiment and see how things progress. There are pros and
> cons to both codebases, neither are perfect. With that in mind this is
> open source and people are free to do their own thing but there is
> strength in numbers. We obviously all care about PostgreSQL and it's
> JDBC driver so let us all try and make the best JDBC driver(s) possible!

+1

Very well put, Mike.

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2013-06-27 14:48:22 Re: JDBC 4 Compliance
Previous Message Adam Gray 2013-06-27 14:32:32 Re: JDBC 4 Compliance