Re: pgsql: Tweak wording in sequence-function docs to avoid PDF build failu

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Tweak wording in sequence-function docs to avoid PDF build failu
Date: 2013-06-27 13:34:34
Message-ID: 51CC3F6A.9030407@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 06/27/2013 12:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tweak wording in sequence-function docs to avoid PDF build failures.
>
> Adjust the wording in the first para of "Sequence Manipulation Functions"
> so that neither of the link phrases in it break across line boundaries,
> in either A4- or US-page-size PDF output. This fixes a reported build
> failure for the 9.3beta2 A4 PDF docs, and future-proofs this particular
> para against causing similar problems in future. (Perhaps somebody will
> fix this issue in the SGML/TeX documentation tool chain someday, but I'm
> not holding my breath.)
>
> Back-patch to all supported branches, since the same problem could rise up
> to bite us in future updates if anyone changes anything earlier than this
> in func.sgml.

Is this issue documented somewhere, so that if it crops up again
somewhere else we know how to identify it and how to fix it?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-06-27 14:00:58 Re: pgsql: Tweak wording in sequence-function docs to avoid PDF build failu
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-06-27 13:00:20 pgsql: pgbench: Add long options for all existing short options.