| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |
| Date: | 2013-06-25 18:44:41 |
| Message-ID: | 51C9E519.9070704@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/25/2013 11:26 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-06-25 11:04:38 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> a) not at all
>>> b) in a single block titled "Reviewers for this version" at the bottom.
>>> c) on the patch they reviewed, for each patch
>>
>> C. The idea that reviewers are somehow less than authors is rather
>> disheartening.
>
> It's not about the reviewers being less. It's a comparison of
> effort. The effort for a casual review simply isn't comparable with the
> effort spent on developing a nontrivial patch.
On the other hand, I will point out that we currently have a shortage of
reviewers, and we do NOT have a shortage of patch submitters. Seems
like we should apply incentives where we need help, no?
Mind you, my votes are (B), (A), and (A).
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2013-06-25 18:55:36 | Re: Hash partitioning. |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2013-06-25 18:44:34 | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |