| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |
| Date: | 2013-06-25 17:17:07 |
| Message-ID: | 51C9D093.3010003@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hackers,
I'd like to take a straw poll here on how we should acknowledge
reviewers. Please answer the below with your thoughts, either on-list
or via private email.
How should reviewers get credited in the release notes?
a) not at all
b) in a single block titled "Reviewers for this version" at the bottom.
c) on the patch they reviewed, for each patch
Should there be a criteria for a "creditable" review?
a) no, all reviews are worthwhile
b) yes, they have to do more than "it compiles"
c) yes, only code reviews should count
Should reviewers for 9.4 get a "prize", such as a t-shirt, as a
promotion to increase the number of non-submitter reviewers?
a) yes
b) no
c) yes, but submitters and committers should get it too
Thanks for your feedback!
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2013-06-25 17:23:10 | Re: Clean switchover |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-06-25 17:15:39 | Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses |