From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] add --throttle to pgbench (submission 3) |
Date: | 2013-06-19 18:53:31 |
Message-ID: | 51C1FE2B.6060102@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/19/13 14:34, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>>> The use case of the option is to be able to generate a continuous gentle
>>> load for functional tests, eg in a practice session with students or for
>>> testing features on a laptop.
>>
>> Why does this need two option formats (-H and --throttle)?
>
> On the latest version it is --rate and -R.
>
> Because you may want to put something very readable and understandable in
> a script and like long options, or have to type it interactively every day
> in a terminal and like short ones. Most UNIX commands include both kind.
>
Would it make sense then to add long versions for all the other standard
options too?
Jan
--
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2013-06-19 18:54:15 | Re: Implementing incremental backup |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-06-19 18:42:30 | Re: [PATCH] pgbench --throttle (submission 7 - with lag measurement) |