From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SET work_mem = '1TB'; |
Date: | 2013-06-18 17:45:14 |
Message-ID: | 51C09CAA.7060009@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> In truth, I hadn't realised somebody had added this to the CF. It was
> meant to be an exploration and demonstration that further work was/is
> required rather than a production quality submission. AFAICS it is
> still limited to '1 TB' only...
At the beginning of the CF, I do a sweep of patch files emailed to
-hackers and not in the CF. I believe there were three such of yours,
take a look at the CF list. Like I said, better to track them
unnecessarily than to lose them.
> Thank you both for adding to this patch. Since you've done that, it
> seems churlish of me to interrupt that commit.
Well, I think that someone needs to actually test doing a sort with,
say, 100GB of RAM and make sure it doesn't crash. Anyone have a machine
they can try that on?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-06-18 17:52:36 | Re: SET work_mem = '1TB'; |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-06-18 17:40:24 | Re: SET work_mem = '1TB'; |