From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chrisfarms(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: ASYNC Privileges proposal |
Date: | 2013-06-18 17:31:40 |
Message-ID: | 51C0997C.5090409@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I had a quick play to see what might be involved [attached], and would like to
>> hear people thoughts; good idea, bad idea, not like that! etc
>
> I question the usefulness of allowing listen/notify to be restricted to
> an entire class of users. The granularity of this seems too broad,
> though I am not sure if allowing message to be sent to a specific user
> is easily achievable.
Well, if we're going to have privs on LISTEN/NOTIFY at all, they should
be on specific message bands, i.e.:
REVOKE LISTEN ON 'cacheupdates' FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT LISTEN ON 'cacheupdates' TO webuser;
GRANT LISTEN ON ALL TO admin;
I can certainly see wanting this, but it'd be a great deal more
sophisticated than what Chris has proposed.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2013-06-18 17:38:00 | Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-06-18 17:19:40 | Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c |