Re: SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, hailong(dot)li(at)qunar(dot)com
Subject: Re: SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work
Date: 2013-06-10 15:27:09
Message-ID: 51B5F04D.1030708@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> That would work fine as long as the invariant is maintained accurately.
> However, there are at least two cases where the existing code fails to
> maintain the invariant:

Hmm. Didn't catch that during development.

> Thoughts?

Give me some time to play around it. Will think.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-06-10 15:38:37 Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-06-10 15:20:13 Re: JSON and unicode surrogate pairs