| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql-XC in production? |
| Date: | 2013-06-07 17:05:21 |
| Message-ID: | 51B212D1.1050902@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 06/07/2013 09:37 AM, Ray Stell wrote:
>
> Is Postgresql-XC being used far-and-wide in production? It looks like an attractive path for a problem I'm considering, that problem being close to zero downtime with data replicated to all the datanodes. I suspect that is not the primary purpose of the effort, rather to partition across the nodes. Testimonials. TIA.
Ray,
The -xc list is probably a better place to ask. Far and Wide is a broad
term. I do know there are companies using it. It certainly doesn't have
the base that we do but it isn't as established either.
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | dx k9 | 2013-06-07 19:29:35 | upgrading with rpm for CentOS 6.3 |
| Previous Message | Ray Stell | 2013-06-07 16:37:56 | Postgresql-XC in production? |