Re: Vacuum, Freeze and Analyze: the big picture

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum, Freeze and Analyze: the big picture
Date: 2013-06-03 17:28:07
Message-ID: 51ACD227.7020806@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff,

> Do we know why anti-wraparound uses so many resources in the first place?
> The default settings seem to be quite conservative to me, even for a
> system that has only a single 5400 rpm hdd (and even more so for any real
> production system that would be used for a many-GB database).
>
> I wonder if there is something simple but currently unknown going on which
> is causing it to damage performance out of all proportion to the resources
> it ought to be using.

Does anti-wraparound vacuum (AWAV) write synchronously? If so, there's
a potential whole world of hurt there.

Otherwise, the effect you're seeing is just blowing out various caches:
the CPU cache, storage cache, and filesystem cache. While we can (and
do) prevent vacuum from blowing out shared_buffers, we can't do much
about the others.

Also, locking while it does its work.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-06-03 17:44:21 Re: UTF-8 encoding problem w/ libpq
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-06-03 17:15:55 Re: Vacuum, Freeze and Analyze: the big picture