| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 |
| Date: | 2013-05-28 17:13:44 |
| Message-ID: | 51A4E5C8.1050503@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/28/2013 08:36 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> The conversation does not change.
>>
>> Further, we are not Firefox. We are not user software. We are
>> developer software.
> At least some of the real-world problems with PostgreSQL
> comes from "We are developer software" mentality.
>
> Yes, We are developer software, but we are also a
> DBA/maintainer/infrastructure manager
I would not hire any of those three that weren't smart enough to
understand our versioning scheme or had the wits to open a web browser
and google:
PostgreSQL versioning
The answer is link #1 on Google.
That said, I won't raise a stink. I am not really of a strong opinion
either way except to say we are not solving a problem. We are just
tickling each other's fancies.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-05-28 17:48:02 | Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited |
| Previous Message | Clark C. Evans | 2013-05-28 17:00:51 | GRANT role_name TO role_name ON database_name |