Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date: 2013-05-28 01:53:51
Message-ID: 51A40E2F.4030202@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/28/2013 09:39 AM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> Yes, I hate the Firefox style number inflation.
I was arguing *for* it ;-)

I don't like it much either, but (a) we do about one release a year, not
one every few weeks and (b) it's very clear from a quick look at Stack
Overflow or first-posts to pgsql-general how confusing two-part major
versions are to users. If it's a bit less aesthetically pleasing I'm OK
with that.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-05-28 02:19:08 Re: [PATCH] add --throttle to pgbench (submission 3)
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-05-28 01:39:59 Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0