From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: descriptions of pg_stat_user_functions and pg_stat_slru |
Date: | 2020-05-25 05:23:36 |
Message-ID: | 519b6526-18fb-3a36-7d1b-7d566f14e7f0@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2020/05/22 22:35, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/05/21 4:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
>>> On 2020/05/20 22:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> OK by me --- that, too, would be more like the existing catalogs
>>>> chapter.
>>
>>> Yeah, so I'd like to propose the attached patch.
>>
>> Hmmm ... I'm not exactly convinced about sticking xreflabels onto
>> the <sect2>s as you've done here. Presumably that would make <xref>s
>> render like "pg_stat_slru" not "Section 27.2.3", which I think is
>> not consistent with our practice elsewhere. I'd be inclined to
>> leave the id attributes on the <table>s, and add xreflabels there
>> if we want them.
>>
>> I see that catalogs.sgml doesn't really match either of those approaches,
>> though. Not sure if we want to change it. It looks like people have
>> tended to use <link> to substitute text for xref's to the catalog
>> sections, so maybe it would be better to add xreflabels there too
>> and simplify the references.
>
> Yeah, since I think that using <xref> is simpler than <link>, I added xlabel
> in <sect2>. But if we don't do that for the consistency with catalog.sgml,
> I think that there are two approaches.
>
> (1) Replace <xref> with <link> when referencing to the monitoring views
> docs. For example, add <sect2 id="monitoring-pg-stat-relication-view">
> and replace <xref linkend="pg-stat-replication-view"/> with
> <link linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-replication-view">.
>
> (2) Leave <xref> as it is. In this case, for example,
> <xref linkend="pg-stat-replication-view"/> references to the table
> of pg_stat_replication instead of the section.
>
> I prefer (1) because it's better to reference to the section rather than
> the table. There are thirty <xref> for monitoring views in the docs and
> they need to be updated.
Attached (monitoring_docfix_v2.patch) is the patch for (1).
I also attached the patch (update_release_note_for_monitoring_stats_views_v1.patch)
that updates the tags referencing to pg_stat_xxx views in release note.
I will propose this to Bruce if we can agree with the changes in monitoring.sgml.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
monitoring_docfix_v2.patch | text/plain | 39.1 KB |
update_release_note_for_monitoring_stats_views_v1.patch | text/plain | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-05-26 11:41:41 | Re: Adding xreflable |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-24 16:07:04 | Re: ERROR: (host) should be replaced by (hostnogssenc). |