| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Date: | 2013-05-22 15:33:16 |
| Message-ID: | 519CE53C.1040703@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 5/22/13 11:05 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> unfortunately, I don't have a s3700 to
> test with, but based on everything i've seen it looks like it's a
> mostly solved problem. (for example, see here:
> http://www.storagereview.com/intel_ssd_dc_s3700_series_enterprise_ssd_review)
> Tests that drive the 710 to <3k iops were not able to take the 3700
> down under 10k at any queue depth.
I have two weeks of real-world data from DC S3700 units in production
and a pile of synthetic test results. The S3700 drives are at least 2X
as fast as the 710 models, and there are synthetic tests where it's
closer to 10X.
On a 5,000 IOPS workload that crushed a pair of 710 units, the new
drives are only hitting 50% utilization now. Does that make worst-case
10K? Maybe. I can't just extrapolate from the 50% figures and predict
the throughput I'll see at 100% though, so I'm still waiting for more
data before I feel comfortable saying exactly what the worst case looks
like.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2013-05-22 16:56:44 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-05-22 15:05:34 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |