From: | Subramaniam Aiylam <aiylam_s(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Postgres processes have a burst of CPU usage |
Date: | 2007-01-23 16:11:11 |
Message-ID: | 519784.22637.qm@web60714.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello all,
I have a setup in which four client machines access
a Postgres database (8.1.1) (on a Linux box). So,
there are connections from each machine to the
database; hence, the Linux box has about 2 postgres
processes associated with each machine.
I am using the JDBC driver
(postgresql-8.1-404.jdbc3.jar) to talk to the
database. I am also using the Spring framework(1.2.2)
and Hibernate (3.0.5) on top of JDBC. I use Apache's
DBCP database connection pool (1.2.1).
Now, there is one particular update that I make from
one of the client machines - this involves a
reasonably large object graph (from the Java point of
view). It deletes a bunch of rows (around 20 rows in
all) in 4-5 tables and inserts another bunch into the
same tables.
When I do this, I see a big spike in the CPU usage
of postgres processes that are associated with ALL the
client machines, not just the one I executed the
delete/insert operation on. The spike seems to happen
a second or two AFTER the original update completes
and last for a few seconds.
Is it that this operation is forcibly clearing some
client cache on ALL the postgres processes? Why is
there such an interdependency? Can I set some
parameter to turn this off?
Regards and thanks,
S.Aiylam
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2007-01-23 17:59:51 | Re: slow result |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-01-23 16:05:51 | Re: extract(field from timestamp) vs date dimension |