Re: Cluster problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Bartley" <abartley(at)evolvosystems(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cluster problem
Date: 2002-11-24 22:23:06
Message-ID: 5197.1038176586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Andrew Bartley" <abartley(at)evolvosystems(dot)com> writes:
> select oid, * from pg_class where relname = 'fish'
> 4289092798
> select max(oid) from pg_class
> 4289092798

> Looks like it has not wrapped.

... but you're within hailing distance of a wrap; that's very nearly 4G.
I wonder whether you are consuming OIDs fast enough that you already
wrapped, and are approaching your second (or Nth) wraparound.

How many tables do you actually have (select count(*) from pg_class)?
It could be that this is just the expected post_wrap behavior:
occasional OID conflicts due to regeneration of the same OID value.
However, unless you have a heckuva lot of pg_class entries I'd expect
the probability of a conflict to be mighty small, so I'm surprised that
you are seeing conflicts often enough to complain about it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Christian Imbeault 2002-11-25 01:13:35 Re: Calculated fileds in pg
Previous Message Andrew Bartley 2002-11-24 22:23:02 Re: Cluster problem