On 18/05/13 03:06, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2013-05-16 18:35, David Kerr wrote:
>
>> - I'll take a look tomorrow, but we WERE seeing Seq Scan's against
>> - multi-million
>> - row tables, so I suspect Tom is right on with the replanning that's in
>> - 9.2 fixing
>> - it, and I'm in the process of validating that.
>>
>> That seems likely, although you could try enable_seqscan=false as well.
>>
>> Dave
> The 9.2 upgrade DOES fix my issue.
>
> Thanks again, Tom and everyone.
>
>
Did you also */enable_seqscan=false as well/*?
Cheers,
Gavin