Re: "on existing update" construct

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Dev Kumkar <devdas(dot)kumkar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "on existing update" construct
Date: 2013-05-15 22:53:24
Message-ID: 519411E4.9090301@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/15/2013 02:22 PM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
> Well ya, stored procedure also was thinking about pre-insert trigger.
>
> Am sure folks here must have gone thru this and had alternatives. Also was
> reading about merge_by_key.

It's been on the TODO list forever. It's harder to implement well than
you would think.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-05-15 23:08:16 Re: pg_dump versus defaults on foreign tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-05-15 22:44:35 Re: pg_dump versus defaults on foreign tables