From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Make "psql -1 < file.sql" work as with "-f" |
Date: | 2013-05-10 13:50:55 |
Message-ID: | 518CFB3F.1040409@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/9/12 9:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:50 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if perhaps -- in addition to what you've done here -- we
>>> should make "psql -1" error out if reading from a terminal.
>>
>> +1 for this.
>
> OK, done.
>
> I had to revise the original patch pretty heavily before committing;
My first use of 9.3beta1 in development failed because of changes
introduced by this patch, specifically because of the newly introduced error
psql: -1 is incompatible with -c and -l
I'm not convinced this is correct. -c and -l are single-transaction
actions almost by definition.
This particular aspect of the change wasn't really brought up in the
original thread. What was your thinking?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-05-10 14:04:31 | Re: Concurrent HOT Update interference |
Previous Message | carla celiberti | 2013-05-10 13:44:41 | Re: Taking the "varattno" in "args" (where part of a query) |