Re: Commit subject line

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit subject line
Date: 2013-05-06 19:09:47
Message-ID: 5187FFFB.5030306@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06.05.2013 20:12, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 06:41:53PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> So what should our goal length be?

Different tools seem to have different truncation points, so it sounds
like the rule is something like: If you can keep it under 50 characters,
great. If you can't, try to keep it below 70. But 75 at most. Or just
"keep it as short as possible, but still meaningful".

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-05-06 19:31:36 Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums
Previous Message Greg Stark 2013-05-06 18:48:09 Re: pg_dump --snapshot