From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
Date: | 2013-05-06 15:28:42 |
Message-ID: | 5187CC2A.6070607@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/06/2013 08:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Per my other mail, I think adding an AMV option at this time is
> inadvisable. I could go either way on removing or keeping the
> is_scannable function --- anybody else have an opinion on that point?
>
> Which of us is going to commit this? We're running low on time ...
As a my two cents, I have been watching this thread and the concern on
timeline is bothering me. I fully understand our want to get into Beta
and I know we don't want to slip schedule too much but quality is
important. It is what makes our project what it is more than any other
value we hold.
I also know we already slipped the beta once but we are not a
corporation, we do not have shareholders and nobody can fire us. If we
need to push it again for quality, shouldn't we?
Sincerely,
JD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-05-06 15:29:11 | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-05-06 15:23:07 | Re: 9.3 release notes suggestions |