From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is this a bug? |
Date: | 2005-01-25 17:59:26 |
Message-ID: | 5185.1106675966@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Now, I know I can specify a constraint name inside the alter command,
> but I still expected this to work.
It does, in 8.0.
regression=# create table foo (id1 int, id2 int, id3 int);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# ALTER TABLE foo ADD unique (id1,id2);
NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD UNIQUE will create implicit index "foo_id1_key" for table "foo"
ALTER TABLE
regression=# ALTER TABLE foo ADD unique (id1,id3);
NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD UNIQUE will create implicit index "foo_id1_key1" for table "foo"
ALTER TABLE
regression=#
Of course there's no free lunch: it's significantly harder to guess what
the index name will be...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-01-25 18:00:32 | Re: Is this a bug? |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-01-25 17:44:04 | Re: Goals for 8.1 |