From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | undisclosed-recipients:; |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: high io BUT huge amount of free memory |
Date: | 2013-05-02 21:13:42 |
Message-ID: | 5182D706.7010900@optionshouse.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/02/2013 12:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> There is a good, but sad, reason for this: IBM and Oracle and their
> partners are the largest employers of people hacking on core Linux
> memory/IO functionality, and both of those companies use DirectIO
> extensively in their products.
I never thought of that. Somehow I figured all the Redhat engineers
would somehow counterbalance that kind of influence.
But that brings up an interesting question. How hard / feasible would it
be to add DIO functionality to PG itself? I've already heard chatter
(Robert Haas?) about converting the shared memory allocation to an
anonymous block, so could we simultaneously open up a DMA relationship?
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-05-02 21:20:15 | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-05-02 21:09:21 | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report |