From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation epub format |
Date: | 2013-05-02 07:42:33 |
Message-ID: | 518218E9.5000102@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 05/01/2013 11:36 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 02/05/13 15:23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 18:27 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> I must admit that there is a bit of a disappointement as far as the
>>> user experience is concerned: the generated file is barely usable on
>>> an iPad2 with the default iBooks reader, which was clearly not
>>> designed for handling a "4592" pages book (from its point of view).
>> Well, clearly there are mainstream books that have 1000 pages, so it
>> ought to be designed for that. It's not clear to me then why it
>> necessarily must fail at 4000 pages. I think you might want to run some
>> experiments to see what the reader can handle before we start doing
>> anything.
>>
>>
> There might be something silly in some eReaders, like reserving 12
> bits for page numbers internally - as 'no one will ever want a book
> with more than 4095 pages!'?
>
>
>
My ancient Sony PRS-505 e-reader has the epub paginated at 5200 pages,
and it seems to work just fine, if a bit slowly.
It's possibly worth noting that the epub is about 1.5 times the size of
that for War and Peace.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-05-03 03:16:39 | Re: Documentation epub format |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-05-02 04:45:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Documentation epub format |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-05-02 08:04:20 | Re: Recovery target 'immediate' |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-05-02 07:31:03 | Re: Recovery target 'immediate' |